When first established in 1995, the Business Court was touted as a way to make North Carolina’s “court system as responsive and predictable as the Delaware Chancery Court in dealing with complex corporate issues.” The Business Court has largely delivered on its promise of ease of use and predictability based, in part, on assignment of cases to a single (and highly qualified) Business Court judge and an e-filing system that practitioners could utilize from any jungle paradise (with wi-fi access). Practitioners must take heed, however. At the end of each Business Court case lurks a menacing tiger: North Carolina appellate practice and procedure!
Over the past two years, at least seven different appellate traps have emerged for North Carolina Business Court cases, many of which have resulted in dismissal of appeals. Those traps have been discussed extensively on our North Carolina Appellate Practice Blog (www.ncapb.com). This article summarizes several potential snares, with links to the detailed blog posts for those who seek more information about taming the beast.
Under Business Court Rule 6.7, a filing must be submitted during normal business hours, or else the filing is deemed to have occurred on the next business day. However, the Business Court’s website sometimes experiences technical glitches that prevent an electronic filing by the Court’s 5:00 p.m. deadline. Under Business Court Rule 6.13, a late filing may be accepted because of technical failures with the electronic filing system only if a party attempted to file twice by the day the filing is due, separated by at least one hour before the 5:00 p.m. deadline. That means to take advantage of Rule 6.13, you must have begun your filing on or before 4:00 p.m. [Note: the Business Court Rules are undergoing substantial revisions in 2016. Although those revisions are likely to alter the “4:00 p.m. deadline,” the new rules still will not allow technical failures to automatically extend a filing deadline. In any event, the best practice is to begin your filing well in advance of the 5:00 p.m. deadline, under either set of rules.]
Bottom line: Unless you believe that both your own and the Business Court’s computer systems are infallible, you should file by 4:00 p.m., at the latest— especially for time-sensitive documents like notices of appeal and notices of designation.
Appellate Rule 3 requires that a notice of appeal be filed “with the clerk of superior court” within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment being appealed. The Business Court has no clerk of court, however. The “clerk” referenced in Appellate Rule 3 is therefore the Clerk of Superior Court where the case was originally filed. If you fail to file the notice of appeal in the “home county” by the 30-day deadline, your appeal will be dismissed.
Bottom line: File your notice of appeal in both the Business Court and in the “home county” by the 30-day appeal deadline.And for good measure, timely serve your notice of appeal using the “old school” method too—either by hand delivery or regular mail.
The Business Court recently dismissed an appeal where a notice of appeal was mailed by commercial delivery service, using the proper address, to the “home county” courthouse well in advance of the appeal deadline. The appealing attorney even received a written delivery confirmation. Apparently, however, the package was initially delivered to the Sheriff’s department, which shares the same building as the Clerk of Court. The day after the deadline, appellant’s counsel called the Clerk’s office, which found the original mailed notice of appeal—unstamped. The clerk immediately stamped the notice of appeal, but it was too late, by one day.
The Sheriff’s department submitted an affidavit stating that it routinely reroutes mail to the Clerk’s office by the next business day. However, the Business Court—applying “strict construction”—dismissed the appeal as untimely.
Bottom line: Until you lay eyes on a filed-stamped notice of appeal, assume the notice of appeal has not been properly filed.
As described below, there is an active debate about how to appeal a Business Court designation order. You won’t ever get that far, however, if you fail to file your notice of designation in both the Business Court and with the “home county” by the deadline provided under N.C.G.S. Section 7A-45.4.
Bottom line: Failure to timely file the notice of designation in both the Business Court and the “home” county will forfeit a party’s right to mandatory Business Court designation.
Before the passage of the Business Court Modernization Act in 2014, a party could appeal a Business Court designation decision (for or against) by asking the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to review it directly. Such appeals were swift and informal. After passage of the Act, the process has become somewhat muddled. Under amended N.C.G.S. Section 7A-45.4, if a party “disagrees with the [designation] decision, the party may appeal in accordance with G.S. 7A-27(a).” Section 7A-27(a), in turn, allows for an appeal “directly to the Supreme Court” from final judgments and certain appealable interlocutory orders. Because a designation decision is not a “final judgment,” to be immediately appealable a designation decision would have to be an order that “[a]ffects a substantial right.” N.C.G.S. § 7A-27(a)(3)(a). However, whether an appeal affects a substantial right is typically decided by the appellate courts based on the facts and circumstances of each case.
Even if the Supreme Court holds that all designation decisions affect a substantial right, the previously swift procedure for challenging a designation decision is gone. Under the amended statute, the entire appeal follows the detailed, and slower, appellate timelines contained in the Rules of Appellate Procedure—i.e., record compilation, full briefing, oral argument, and decision by the full court. Under Section 1-294, the Business Court (on at least one occasion) has held that all further trial court proceedings are stayed while everyone awaits the Supreme Court’s designation decision.
These changes may have been inadvertent, but the interplay between the statutes appears to be inescapable.
Bottom line: If your opponent appeals a designation decision, be prepared to wait a year for the case to get going again—in the Business Court or another Superior Court.
The 2014 Business Court Modernization Act also provides for a direct appeal to the Supreme Court from all Business Court orders. However, the new law only applies to actions “designated” as mandatory complex business cases on or after October 1, 2014—meaning a lot of cases in the pipeline must still be appealed first to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. This new law is particularly tricky for cases designated on or around the October 1, 2014 for the following reasons:
The appellate courts have an obligation to ensure they have jurisdiction in each appeal. Certain documents—like the order being appealed and the notice of appeal—have long been required to be included in the record on appeal to prove jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals recently held that the documents designating the case to the Business Court also fall into this same category of documents that are jurisdictionally required to be placed in the record. Designation documents are used to determine which version of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-27 governs your appeal: the earlier version of the statute that requires appeal to the Court of Appeals, or the later one that requires appeal directly to the Supreme Court.
Under recent case law, whether you have actually appealed to the correct appellate court is not the issue. Instead, the inquiry is whether theappellate record demonstrates that you have appealed to the correct appellate court. Even though the designation documents are publicly available on the Business Court’s website, do not count on the appellate courts taking judicial notice of those documents. Nor should you expect to have prior notice of a record deficiency before your appeal is dismissed for failure to demonstrate proper appellate jurisdiction. Finally, since it is unclear which pleading or order counts as the “official” designation document under the Business Court Modernization Act (see above), your best bet is to include the notice of designation, the business court’s order on designation, and the Supreme Court’s order on designation.
Note: In July 2016, the key opinion on this issue was withdrawn in response to appellants’ motion seeking to amend the record, asking the court to take judicial notice of the designation date, and requesting consideration of the case on the merits. No word on what the reissued opinion will say, but it is unlikely that the reissued opinion will completely abolish this trap.
Bottom line: Include in your record on appeal all designation-related documents. And for good measure, explain in your appellate brief’s “Statement of Appellate Jurisdiction” why those designation documents show that you have appealed to the correct appellate court.
When originally passed in 2014, the Business Court Modernization Act contained language that arguably created concurrent appellate jurisdiction in both the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court over certain interlocutory orders from the Business Court. In the fall of 2015, the General Assembly passed a technical amendments bill that mostly fixed that concurrent appellate jurisdiction problem—at least for Business Court cases designated on or after October 1, 2015.
A couple of glitches remain, however. First, there are at least three types of civil orders that can be immediately appealed: 1) final judgments, 2) interlocutory orders immediately appealable under Section 7A-27(a)(3), including substantial right appeals, and 3) interlocutory orders that are made immediately appealable by some statute other than Section 7A-27. The first two categories of orders are now directly appealable to the Supreme Court under Section 7A-27. But the statute does not expressly provide for direct appeal to the Supreme Court from the third category of orders—orders made appealable by statute, including: N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b) (Rule 54(b) certification appeals); § 1-569.28 (appeal from certain interlocutory arbitration orders); § 1-277(b) (certain interlocutory appeals for lack of personal jurisdiction); and § 7A-45.4 (appeals from Business Court designation orders). Such orders are bound to be entered by the Business Court from time to time, creating an ambiguity as to which appellate court could properly hear an appeal from those orders.
Second, Business Court judges occasionally are assigned to preside over regular sessions of court that are not “complex business cases.” However, inconsistent wording in Section 7A-27 may mean that for orders signed by a Business Court judge that are not complex business cases, final judgment appeals might proceed to the Court of Appeals, while appeals of interlocutory orders lie directly to the Supreme Court.
While the General Assembly will probably fix these two glitches at some point, that fix will create another statutory “effective” date to keep straight.
Bottom line: When determining which appellate court has jurisdiction over your appeal, first determine which of the three (and perhaps soon four) versions of N.C.G.S. Section 7A-27 applies—and then study that statute carefully.
Hopefully, this article will help you avoid being bitten as you transition from the North Carolina Business Court to North Carolina’s appellate courts. Just remember: When appealing a Business Court decision, it’s a jungle out there!
https://ncbarblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Its-a-jungle-out-there.jpg10002817NCBARBLOGhttps://ncbarblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Blog-Header-1-1030x530.pngNCBARBLOG2016-08-09 14:38:002016-08-09 14:38:00Planning To Pursue An Appeal From A Business Court Decision? It’s A Jungle Out There!