Entries by Labor

4th Circuit’s Dueling Disability Discrimination Decisions Analyze ‘Illegal-Exam’ Claims Under ADA/Rehabilitation Act

By Andrew J. Henson When can an employer require its employee to undergo a medical exam without running afoul of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or the Rehabilitation Act? In recent weeks, the Fourth Circuit enriched the case law on illegal-exam claims in two divergent opinions, ruling for the employee in EEOC v. McLeod […]

To Protect and Serve . . . and Make a Living: Court Rules Moonlighting Police Officers Are Employees At Second Jobs

By Kevin Murphy Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recognized that “the way we work in America is changing. The relationships between companies and their workers are more fluid and varied than in decades past.” Acosta v. Off Duty Police Services, Inc., Nos. 17-5995/6071 (6th Cir.  Feb. 12, 2019). Many […]

Top 5 Federal L&E Developments From the Past Year

By Robin E. Shea With many of President Trump’s agency nominations being held up in the Senate, followed by the longest government shutdown in history, it’s been a relatively quiet year for labor and employment law at the federal level. Nonetheless, here are my picks for the most significant developments of the past year. No. […]

Artificial Intelligence In Hiring: Do the Risks Outweigh the Advantages?

By Charles Smith With the increasingly competitive workforce, employers are searching for ways to efficiently hire quality candidates.  One method employers use to lower costs and simultaneously increase efficiency is the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to assist with the tedious job of searching through countless resumes.  While AI undoubtedly offers significant advantages to employers, […]

Procedure Matters: Fourth Circuit Holds 180-Day Waiting Period for Federal Employees to File Suit is Not Jurisdictional

By Zachary Anstett In a published opinion on January 8, 2019, the Fourth Circuit concluded that Section 2000e-16(c), which applies to federal government workers, is not a jurisdictional requirement. The 180-day waiting period is instead a prudential prerequisite to suit. Because of the Court’s holding, employers will need to use Rule 12(b)(6) when claiming that […]

Is Every Vice President a Fiduciary?

By Joe Murray Charlotte is a banking town, and in banking towns, everyone’s a vice president. If you work for a bank, brokerage firm, or other financial institution for a couple of years, you’ll make VP, even if your duties, management responsibilities, and pay don’t change. Dunn, Andrew, Your Charlotte bank VP title doesn’t really […]

Appellate Update — and a Happy New Year

By Joe Murray For the last post of the year, I’m doing my normal case roundup. It’s been several months since I last posted — thank you to everyone who submitted posts this fall! — so this is a long one. I’ve inserted which laws are addressed in each case if you’re looking for something […]

Employer Confidentiality Policy Yields to Title VII’s Participation Clause in Recent Fourth Circuit Opinion

By Joseph E. Hjelt Employees who face discriminatory treatment at work are often faced with the dilemma of how to substantiate their claims, and how to guard against the risk that their employer will hide or destroy evidence. Frequently, employees choose to take possession of substantiating evidence by forwarding emails to their personal address, or […]

The Office Christmas Party: Conundrums and Caveats

By William Joseph Austin Jr. There, in the very title of this article is the first and fundamental conundrum—can we, should we, call it a “Christmas party”?  Boldly, I say yes.  There is certainly a school of thought that, for the sake of inclusiveness and sensitivity to diversity, would rename the event generically and perhaps […]

District Court Holds that Pregnancy Fits Within the NCEEPA’s Prohibition of “Sex” Discrimination

By Sean F. Herrmann In 1983, the North Carolina Supreme Court decided N.C Dept. of Corrections v. Gibson, 308 N.C. 131 (1983). Gibson frequently appears in wrongful discharge in violation of North Carolina public policy (“WDPP”) briefs, especially when the plaintiffs’ claims rely on the North Carolina Equal Employment Practices Act (“NCEEPA”) for their underlying […]